By:
“The Catalysts”
Joanna Freeman
Glenn Murray
Alyssa Seaton
Laurel Wangler
Our project explores the differences
in nutrition based on chemical makeup between whole and soy milk. To assist
in this exploration, various carbohydrate, photosynthetic, and enzyme tests
were used.
First, we utilized five different tests to determine various types of carbohydrates:
Benedict’s, Barfoed’s, Selivanoff’s, Bial’s and Iodine
tests. Whole milk tested positive for reducing sugars and ketoses. Soy milk
tested positive for ketoses, hexose furanose rings and starches. From these
results, it seems that soy milk has a greater variety of carbohydrates, possibly
making it more complex.
Next, we analyzed the photosynthetic
elements within whole and soy milk through the paper chromatography and the
absorption spectrum tests. These tests provided us knowledge of pigments specific
to the two milk specimens and also a soybean solution. The chromatography
for both milk solutions showed no pigments. The absorption spectrum test used
a spectrophotometer to measure the absorbency of different pigments in the
milk by inducing the milk specimen to various visual wavelengths of light.
For all three specimens, red light (400nm) was absorbed the most and descended
to purple light (700nm). We observed that whole milk had the greatest overall
absorbencies, for all wavelengths, followed by soy milk and the soybeans solution.
The last portion of our experiment examined
the protein concentrations of whole and soy milk by means of the Bradford
Assay test. The readings from whole and soy milk were compared to a standard
protein curve to determine its protein concentration, showing whole milk with
greater concentration than soy milk.
Discussion
By Glenn Murray
Revised by Laurel Wangler
2nd Revision by Joanna Freeman and Laurel Wangler
In our experiment, we were investigating
whether Meijer whole milk (3.25% milkfat) or plain Silk soy milk was more
nutritious, based on the difference in chemical makeup. The amount of nutrition
will be determined by the presence of carbohydrates, protein concentration,
and absorption of light at different wavelengths. Carbohydrates are a source
of energy for the body and protein provides amino acids for forming body proteins
for building and repairing tissues (Columbia Encyclopedia, 2003). Carbohydrates
and protein are important aspects when discussing proper nutrition (Columbia
Encyclopedia, 2003). Whole or soy milk will have to have a greater content
of carbohydrates and concentration of protein in order to be considered more
nutritious than the other.
Before starting experimentation, we believed
that whole milk was going to have more variety in chemical makeup because
of the source it is being derived from. Cow milk consists of proteins, fat,
salts, and milk sugar, or lactose (Columbia Encyclopedia, 2003). Soy milk
comes from soybeans that are broken down into liquid form (U.S. Soyfoods Directory,
2003). We believe that many chemical compounds are broken up during this process.
We conducted tests that range from simple indication techniques, used for
carbohydrate detection, to the Bradford Assay test, which is commonly used
for determining protein concentration. We also performed chromatography and
absorption tests, which analyzed pigments present and light absorbed. Our
first series of experiments utilized indicators to analyze the carbohydrate
composition of whole milk and soymilk.
Our first indication test (Benedict’s
Test) evaluated the carbohydrates found in soy and whole milk for either a
free ketone group or an aldehyde group. If a free ketone or aldehyde group
was present during Benedict’s test, then our two milk solutions contained
reducing sugars. Common reducing sugars include glucose and fructose based
on results from a previous lab found in the lab manual. In a normal benedict’s
test, a red precipitate should form in the presence of reducing sugars. During
our trial tests, none of the dilutions of either soy or whole milk resulted
in a red precipitate (Figures 1, 2; Table 1). All the soy milk dilutions resulted
in a blue solution which indicates no change. Therefore, these results showed
the lack in presence of reducing sugars in soy milk. As for whole milk, both
the 10 percent and 25 percent dilution solutions resulted in an opaque green
solution and the 50 percent dilution had a burnt orange. These results support
that the 10 percent and 25 percent solutions did not have reducing sugars
present. On the other hand, we can not refute that the 50 percent dilution
did not have a red precipitate. It is quite possible that the opaque white
color of milk influenced the results of the test and quite possibly masked
the results. Also, since the positive control started out as a clear solution
and the milk is a white opaque solution it is hard to compare the results
of the two. Therefore there possibly could be reducing sugars present in the
50 percent dilution of whole milk but they were disguised by the opaque white
color of the initial solution.
The second test we did under the reducing
sugars category was the Barfoed’s Test, which indicates the presence
of either monosaccharides or disaccharides. The Barfoed-milk solution was
only allowed to react for two minutes, because if more time was permitted,
disaccharides would have had time to hydrolyze into monosaccharides. When
the Barfoed’s test was performed on our various dilution levels of both
soy and whole milk, the results showed no change for all repetitions (Figures
3,4; Table 2). However, unlike the negative control, sucrose, all the repetitions
had white precipitate particles that formed along with the no change in blue
color. More likely than not, this white precipitate is curdled milk that formed
from the combination of heating the milk solutions with the Barfoed’s
solution. Based on our test results we support that both soy and whole milk
contain di- and polysaccharides. This did not necessarily mean that monosaccharide
were not present in soy and whole milk, it was just that they did not show
in this particular test.
The next test we used to scrutinize the
chemical composition of soy and whole milk was Selivanoff’s test. The
Selivanoff test was used to distinguish between aldose and ketose compounds.
Both aldose and ketose are monosaccharide sugars, but differ in structure.
The whole milk dilutions were all negative; therefore, there was not any detection
of either ketose or aldose in the solutions we used (Figure 5; Table 3). This
does not mean that aldose or ketose were not present in whole milk it was
just that for the set of dilutions and repetitions we carried out resulted
in not detecting either. As for soy milk, the results of all the repetitions
supported that ketoses and aldoses were present (Figure 6; Table 3). The positive
control used for this test was fructose, which when combined with the Selivanoff’s
reagent and heated produced a dark red color. In our experiment the 50 percent
dilution yielded this exact dark red color. As for the 10 and 25 percent solutions
they yielded a less intense red color, which we attribute to the fact that
the milk was diluted down which could make the presence of both the ketoses
and aldoses not as strong as in the 50 percent dilution. Nevertheless, whole
milk had a negative detection of aldoses and ketoses while soymilk had a positive
detection.
To further decipher the chemical makeup
of soy and whole milk, Bial’s test was performed. Bial’s test
primarily indicates furanoses (five-membered rings). Pentose furanoses will
react with Bial’s reagent to create an olive green solution, whereas
hexose furanose will react to form a darker olive color. The set of whole
milk repetitions resulted in a negative detection for both pentose and hexose
furanoses (Figure 7; Table 4). Whereas the 50 percent dilution soy milk solution
resulted in a olive green solution which means the presence of hexose furanoses
(Figure 8; Table 4). As for the 10 and 25 percent dilution soy milk solutions,
the 10 present was a dark yellow and the 25 was a dark yellow with a tint
of olive green (Figure 8; Table 4). We believe the less intense nature of
coloring for the two percentages is caused by the dilution and that the presence
of hexose furanoses is not strong enough to cause a reaction to create the
olive green color.
Our final carbohydrate test tested for
the presence of starch. Starch is a coiled polymer of glucose, and is classified
as a complex sugar. The results for both soy and whole milk proved to be inconclusive;
none of the solutions detected the presence of starch (Figures 9, 10; Table
5). For whole milk all the solutions resulted in a color similar to that of
the negative control. On the other hand for soy milk the solutions resulted
in very bizarre colors that neither supported the negative nor the positive
control. To obtain more accurate results it might have been better to include
a test that had 100 percent soy and whole milk solution which may have led
to detection of any starches. It is possible that because of the dilutions
the starch was too faint to detect any significant amount. Carbohydrates are
abundant in most types of milk. Research in the types of carbohydrates, and
their corresponding physiological effects, would be beneficial to pursue to
better the nutritional value and the overall product of milk. For instance,
raffinose oligosaccharides are the main contributors to the flatulence that
follows the consumption of soy bean products, such as soy milk (Guimaraes,
2001). At the molecular level, flatulence, in monogastric mammals, occurs
from the lack of the alpha-galactosidase enzyme (Guimaraes, 2001). If raffinose
oligosaccharides can be illiminated from soy bean products, than soy beans
would have a positive effect on the digestion of soy-based foods in monogastric
mammals (Guimaraes, 2001). Another interesting aspect of our study dealt with
analysis of whole and soy milk at the photosynthetic level.
The photosynthetic aspect of our experiment
dealt with testing for which type of milk had the greater concentration of
pigments and ability to absorb light. After completing a paper chromatography
test, we detected slight amounts of pigments in soy milk and none in whole
milk. Soy milk comes from the soybean, which is produced by the soybean plant.
Soybean plants are photosynthetic and thus why there should be traceable amounts
of photosynthetic elements in soymilk. We also conducted an absorption spectrum
test which allowed us to observe the absorption of both soy and whole milk
at different wavelengths. The results of this test showed absorption readings
for all wavelengths because milk, having the white coloration absorbs all
colors.
Our third portion of our experiment was the enzymic section. We tested for total protein concentration in whole and soy milk with a Bradford Assay. Both soy milk and whole milk had considerable concentrations of proteins. Soy products all contain the soy protein, so soy milk should have higher concentrations and absorbency numbers then whole milk. Whole milk should also have high protein concentration because it comes from a cow. Soy protein containing isoflavones affect the lipids found in postmenopausal women (Dalais, 2003). Lipids such as triacylglycerol and LDL are found to affect cholesterol levels (cholesterol levels affect nutrition) so research on soy bean protein and their link with lipids in postmenopausal women could have general applications in the fields of biological nutrition.
Figure 13: Bovine Serum Albumin (BSA) Standard curve. Absorbance readings were taken at 595 nm because CBBG (Coomassie Brilliant Blue G-250 Dye) binds to amino acids in the anionic form at this wavelength. As the concentration of BSA increases, so does the absorbance reading. A picture perfect standard curve should depict a linear relationship between protein concentration and absorbance.
In conclusion of the chemical compositions
of whole and soy milk, our experimental data and results have pointed to an
array of differences in chemical makeup. Based on testing results, soy milk
seems to have higher protein concentration and greater number and variety
of carbohydrates. Therefore, we have found support that soy milk is more nutritious
than whole milk.