Abstract:
Our goal was to compare red cabbage
(Brassica oleracea var capita rubra) and
lettuce (Lactuca sativa) through a series of tests to determine
similarities and differences in carbohydrates, photosynthetic
pigments, and enzymes. Our hypothesis was that red cabbage and
lettuce would have similar carbohydrates and enzymes, but different
photosynthetic qualities.
Lettuce and red cabbage performed
differently in the Benedict's and Barfoed's tests with lettuce having
free ketones or aldehydes and monosaccharides, and red cabbage with
neither. Bial's test for furanose or pyranose rings showed that
lettuce has pentose-furanose rings while red cabbage has
hexose-furanose rings. Selivanoff's test for structure showed
that red cabbage has disaccharide ketoses present while lettuce has
monosaccharide ketoses. According to the Iodine test, neither
lettuce nor cabbage contains starch. The paper chromatography
test showed similarity between lettuce and red cabbage in that the Rf
values infer that both contain carotene, xanthophyll, chlorophyll a,
and chlorophyll b. The differences in absorption spectra are
that lettuce peaks at 400nm and shows a small peak at 670nm, whereas
red cabbage peaks at 400nm and has a large peak at 610nm.
Lettuce has polyphenoloxidase (PPO) but red cabbage does not.
The effect of pH on lettuce peaked at the pH values 6.5 and 7.5.
We found that our hypothesis was
incorrect. Red cabbage and lettuce, though they seem similar
because of shape and growth, are actually very different. Our
research implies that red cabbage and lettuce differ not only for
photosynthetic activity, but also for enzyme activity and carbohydrate
structure.
Table:
Table 1: Photosynthesis Rf Value Results
This table shows the results for the paper
chromatography test for both red cabbage and lettuce. This test
was done to determine which pigments were present in our
samples. Rf calculations for all of the pigments were found by
dividing the pigment distance by the solvent front distance.
They were compared to the controls for each pigment. The green
band is then considered to be chlorophyll b, the bright green band is
chlorophyll a, the yellow band is xanthophyll, and the orange/yellow
band is carotene. Both red cabbage and lettuce show bands for all
four of these pigments.
|
|
Green Band
|
Green Band
|
Bright Green Band
|
Bright Green Band
|
Yellow Band
|
Yellow Band
|
Orang/yellow Band
|
Oramge/yellow Band
|
Solvent Front
|
|
|
Distance (cm)
|
Rf
Value
|
Distance (cm)
|
Rf
Value
|
Distance (cm)
|
Rf
Value
|
Distance
(cm)
|
Rf
Value
|
Distance
(cm)
|
|
Trial 1
|
1.7
|
0.122
|
2.8
|
0.201
|
4.8
|
0.345
|
13.9
|
1
|
13.9
|
Red Cabbage
|
Trial 2
|
1.3
|
0.119
|
No Band
|
No Band
|
3.0
|
0.275
|
10.9
|
1
|
10.9
|
|
Trial 3
|
1.1
|
0.091
|
1.8
|
0.149
|
4.1
|
0.339
|
12.1
|
1
|
12.1
|
|
Trial 1
|
2.0
|
0.180
|
2.7
|
0.243
|
4.1
|
0.369
|
11.1
|
1
|
11.1
|
Lettuce
|
Trial 2
|
1.5
|
0.121
|
2.3
|
0.185
|
3.5
|
0.282
|
12.4
|
1
|
12.4
|
|
Trial 3
|
2.1
|
0.186
|
3.0
|
0.265
|
4.6
|
0.407
|
11.3
|
1
|
11.3
|
Discussion:
In this experiment we examined
Brassica Oleracea (cabbage) and Lactuca Sativa (lettuce) in a variety of
carbohydrate, enzyme and photosynthesis tests. Through these
tests, we wanted to determine the differences between red cabbage and
iceberg lettuce. For a control, we used the facilitated
experiments in the lab manual (Maleszewski, 2003 Pps. 63-84).
Each of the control experiments came out as expected and created a
basis to compare each test with and the possible results therein.
Brassica Oleracea contains many
vitamins, anti-cancer and antioxidant compounds. Aside from
enhancing antioxidant effects in the body, red cabbage also aids in
detoxification. Other compounds in cabbage slow tumor growth and
act as cancer inhibitors (Wolford et al., 2001). Phenols present
in cabbage can help to prevent the development of carcinogens
(Christman, 2002). Cabbage is often used in coleslaws, various
salads, or served by itself either pickled or boiled.
Lactuca Sativa is a good source
of vitamin A, potassium and also contains vitamin C, calcium, iron,
and copper. Just like cabbage, it contains anti-oxidants, which
can prevent various forms of cancer (Wolford et al., 2001).
Lettuce is particularly popular in salads and is commonly used as a
garnish (Neild, 1990).
Originally we hypothesized that
Brassica Oleracea and Lactuca Sativa would be similarly structured in
organic composition and enzymes present but that they would differ in
photosynthetic qualities. Our predictions were not completely correct
as the results show that red cabbage and lettuce are in fact different
in structure, photosynthetic activity and enzyme activity.
The first set of
experiments we did consisted of carbohydrate structure tests.
The results of the carbohydrate tests we conducted imply that red
cabbage and iceberg lettuce are not structurally similar. We conducted
five different carbohydrate tests: Benedict's, Barfoed's,
Selivanoff's, Bial's, and an Iodine test (Table 4).
In the Benedict's test it was
observed that lettuce contains either a free ketose or free aldose
because it formed a red precipitate, telling us that lettuce contains
reducing sugars. In the same test for red cabbage, no
precipitate formed, so it does not contain a free ketose or
aldose. “In a solution of pH 8 or higher the [reducing] sugar is
capable of reducing certain weak oxidizing agents such as cupric
hydroxide along with a resultant oxidation of the carboxyl group of the
sugar” (Maleszewski, 2003 pg. 64). This result could help
explain why lettuce is an affective anti-oxidizer.
The Selivanoff's test followed
the Benedict's test further, not only showing that a free ketose or
aldose was present, but also classifying cabbage and lettuce as having
either one or the other. As ketoses are faster to react than
aldoses, and because the test for lettuce changed to red in less than
a minute a monosaccharide ketose was present. Red Cabbage took
slightly longer, approximately one minute, which implies that
disaccharide ketoses are present.
A green or olive colored product
resulting from Bial’s reagent is indicative of pentose-furanose
rings. A muddy brown colored product, however, indicates a
hexose-furanose ring. Our results from Bial's test showed that lettuce
had a pentose-furanose ring since a color change to olive green was
observed. For red cabbage the test results confirmed that it
contains hexose-furanose rings because a muddy brown color resulted.
“Carbohydrates may contain one
sugar molecule (monosaccharides), two sugar molecules (disaccharides)
or many sugar units (polysaccharides)” (Maleszewski, 2003 pg. 63).
Barfoed's test for lettuce showed rust colored precipitate that
implied that monosaccharides were present. The same test for red
cabbage showed no color change and therefore the sugars present were
not monosaccharides.
The final carbohydrate test we
performed was the Iodine experiment, which tests for starch.
When starch is present the sample will turn a blue-black color. The
solution of red cabbage did show a color change but it did not turn the
blue-black color of starch indication, instead it changed to a
gray-brown. The color change is apparently a mixture of the
reddish purple cabbage solution and the yellow-brown of the
Iodine. The lettuce solution did not turn color and therefore
starch was not present.
Our carbohydrate results imply
that the carbohydrate make-up of red cabbage is disaccharide ketoses
and pentose-furanose rings. Lettuce's carbohydrate make-up was
found to be free ketoses, monosaccharide ketoses, and pentose-furanose
rings.
An interesting observation during
both the Bial's and Selivanoff's tests was that the red cabbage
solutions changed to a pink when the reagents were added prior to the
actual tests. This is due to red cabbage being a pH indicator and
both Selivanoff's and Bial's reagents being acidic (Cobb, 1998).
The results we obtained for
photosynthesis disagreed with our hypothesis. We performed a
pigment identification test using chromatogram strips to determine
which pigments the cabbage and the lettuce contained. We were
able to determine various pigments by the color and the distance the
solvent moved down the strip over a period of time. Both lettuce and
cabbage had carotene (orange-yellow), xanthophylls (pale yellow),
chlorophyll a (blue-green) and chlorophyll b present (pale
green). The Rf values obtained from the tests represent positive
identification of the specified pigments we found (Table 1). Each
Rf value represents the distance each pigment traveled divided by the
solvent front distance.
The absorption spectrum test was
done to show the absorption of wavelengths of light given off by
separate pigments present in each species. Both cabbage and
lettuce were different, supporting the original claim. As the
wavelength was increased from 400nm to 700nm, the absorption of light
by the lettuce solution decreased with one noticeable increase at
670nm. Most photosynthesis is done at the 400nm to 535nm range
with a small area of increased photosynthesis around 670nm. As
the wavelength was increased from 400nm to 700nm, red cabbage overall
decreased, but had several points of increase along the way at
approximately 400nm and 610nm (Table 3). Red cabbage
photosynthesizes well from 400nm to 640nm with peak photosynthesis
occurring at 610nm. Red cabbage absorbs well in the blue light
(~400nm) region as well as the green light (~600) region, but not well
in the red light (~700nm) region therefore, red light is reflected and
it produces the red color.
New solutions of the red cabbage
and lettuce were made for the absorption tests because they looked less
colorful and had a slight stench (Figure 8). It was suspected that
theses old solutions could affect the results of the photosynthetic
tests. This was found to be partly true as the red cabbage
absorbance spectra for the new and old solutions varied drastically
(Figures 11 & 12). Also, the absorption spectra for old
solutions were higher in absorbance than those for the new
solutions. It is speculated that this is due to either the
deteriorating cells absorbing light or the fact that the new solutions
were made with leaves from further within each species.
The tests for enzymes differed
from our original hypothesis that red cabbage and lettuce would
contain similar enzymes. The results we obtained through our
experiments, however, showed that the lettuce contained
polyphenoloxidase (PPO) while the cabbage did not. Because PPO
catalyzes the oxidation of catechol it was used to test for the
presence of PPO. When catechol was added to the lettuce, it
turned a dark brown color from its normal pale green. We tested the
effect of pH on the lettuce to see how different levels of pH would
react with the lettuce. The results showed a general increased,
in absorbance as pH increased but since the cabbage tested negative
for PPO this didn't have any significant bearing on our results.
During these tests various
problems arose that may have affected our data. These include
human error in measurements and perception of color change. Also
mechanical errors may have occurred during the use of the
spectrometers. Contamination of the species involved is also an
issue because we did not personally grow them, and therefore could not
control both environments in an identical manner.
After the completion of all of
the tests, we found that our hypothesis was mostly incorrect.
The evidence implied that red cabbage and lettuce differ in enzyme
activity and carbohydrate structure. The only similarity between
the two was found in the paper chromatography, which showed a
similarity in photosynthesis, but according to the absorption spectra,
the two are not entirely the same in photosynthesis either.